Department Press Briefing – November 19, 2024 – United States Department of State

MR MILLER: So you might have seen that the President’s Special Envoy Amos Hochstein was in Beirut today meeting with the speaker of the Lebanese parliament. He gave a press statement after that where he made clear that we have made significant progress and that an agreement is within reach, but it’s going to take decisions by both parties – by both Israel and Lebanon – to actually get an agreement. And that’s what we’re going to continue to push for.

QUESTION: Okay. Well, so, I mean, where does this leave us right now?

MR MILLER: It leaves us that we’re going to continue to talk to the parties to try to get an agreement. There are a number of issues we —

QUESTION: Who is? He is?

MR MILLER: The United States, yeah, the – Amos, the special envoy, is the lead negotiator, but then you know the President has been involved at various times; the Secretary has been involved at various times. And it’ll be – continue to be an across-the-government focus to try and reach a diplomatic resolution because it’s critical to getting people back to their homes on both sides of the Blue Line.

QUESTION: Okay. And the – and the main goal of this proposal is essentially the basic framework of what you guys and the French had laid out at the end of September, which is a – obviously a ceasefire, but also full implementation of 1701?

MR MILLER: It is the full – without getting into the underlying details, which I know you’ll understand given that we’re still negotiating this potential resolution, we want to see the full implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 so both Israelis and Lebanese civilians can return to their homes.

QUESTION: But what I’m getting at is that this proposal or what he is – was over there discussing with the Lebanese and is apparently going to Israel to discuss with the Israelis is essentially the same as what you had on the table before. Is that correct, or no?

MR MILLER: So the – I am going to answer that by saying obviously, in the course of negotiations, proposals always evolve because it’s a conversation that happens between the relevant parties and us as the mediator. So the proposal that is on the table right now is not identical to the proposal that was on the table two weeks ago or two months ago, but the overall framework that we’re trying to reach is, yes, full implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701.

QUESTION: All right, thanks.

MR MILLER: Humeyra.

QUESTION: Matt, this might be a bizarre question, but do you know why he is —

MR MILLER: I’d be surprised. I’d be surprised by that.

QUESTION: Do you know why he is more optimistic than before? The reason I ask this is, like, we’ve been here many, many times with Gaza ceasefire. What is the concrete progress that you guys have made that you think you’re on the cusp of it this time?

MR MILLER: So I’m not going to speak to the underlying details, which I’d have to to tell you where the assessment comes from, but obviously when we come out and give you an assessment about where negotiations stand, it’s based on our conversations with the parties. And so he can make the kind of statement he made – I can make the kind of statement I made yesterday when I noted that we had made progress – because we are in conversation with the parties and we can see that we have overcome some of the obstacles to getting a resolution. But there’s more to be done and we need an agreement from the parties, but we are working to accomplish that. We want to get one done as soon as possible.

QUESTION: Can you put a timeline at all?

MR MILLER: No, I can’t do that.

QUESTION: Has the – it is our understanding that the United States has agreed to the Israeli condition that when it’s struck by Hizballah from across the border in Lebanon that it has – it reserves the right to go in and attack those targets. Is that correct?

MR MILLER: I am not going to speak to any underlying details of the agreement, which is not to say – not to either confirm or not confirm; just to say when it comes to any underlying details of this resolution that we are trying to reach, while we are still in the negotiating stages, I don’t think it would be helpful for me to be talking about what the details are publicly.

QUESTION: Right. On the civilian harm channel that you guys were discussing and you mentioned in the – in the letter, do you have any updates for us on that?

MR MILLER: We have scheduled a meeting between senior officials here at the department and senior officials in the Israeli Government in early December. It will be the first meeting of that new channel.

QUESTION: And that would take place here or virtually?

MR MILLER: I’m not going to get into the details of that meeting, but we – it’ll happen in early December.

QUESTION: Can you say how senior those Israeli officials and State Department officials will be?

MR MILLER: Senior – when it – as we get closer to the date and certainly on the date and after, we’ll have a more specific readout of the people that were involved, but at this point, no, I don’t want to get into it.

QUESTION: Right. A couple of final things. So the – so we can assume that this – the channel is set up now and it’s going to – and this is going to be —

MR MILLER: Correct.

QUESTION: — its first meeting. And, like, what is your plan about this channel given that you’re saying this meeting is going to happen in December? I suspect, then, you’re going to have maybe a month or so or, like, 40 days to talk to the Israelis about this. What do you intend to achieve during that very limited time?

MR MILLER: So the purpose of this channel is to inform the ongoing work that the State Department has to do to make assessments about the use of U.S.-provided weapons. That’s what we want to do, as well as to gather our own information about what Israel is doing. We get questions from you about specific strikes, and we want to know the answers both to be responsive to the media and for our own purposes. So it’s to gather information about incidents that have been raised that are a cause of concern or a cause of question.

Now, we take all the information we gather, whether it be from public reporting by the media, whether it be from NGOs, whether it be from the Government of Israel or other governments, and feed it into our processes – both our policymaking processes and the judgments that we have to make about potential violations of international humanitarian law. And we will continue to do that.

QUESTION: Right. So given that this channel is now set up and you will have a meeting and you intend to use the time to further your ongoing assessments, which have been ongoing for more than a year, can you commit that one of those many assessments will conclude in the end?

MR MILLER: What do you mean that they will conclude? Do you mean January 20th?

QUESTION: That you know – yes.

MR MILLER: So let me just step back and say that the assessments that the State Department is required to make are legal requirements, and they’re not legal requirements that are attached to any one administration. That burden for the State Department continues through the end of this administration and into the following administration. So we want to get that work done as quickly as possible. But this is not a partisan exercise, it is not a political exercise by this administration. This is the serious work of government that is supposed to go on regardless of who the president is.

QUESTION: Final thing. Sure, I understand that. But at the moment you guys are still in charge, and I’m asking this administration – because I’ve asked this question many, many times. It’s been over a year you have said to us these assessments about Israel’s potential IHL violations has been going on. The fact that you have this channel, does that mean your work on that front is going to speed up or not?

MR MILLER: So our work is already moving as quickly as we can possibly make it move. But they are difficult assessments that we have to make that require both gathering facts and making, in some cases, complicated judgments. And so I have never been able to put a timetable on that work, because we have a number of different incidents that we are looking at. But we are committed to working through that process and having an answer as quickly as possible.

QUESTION: Can I follow up?

MR MILLER: Yeah.

QUESTION: Has there been any conclusion to the 500 CHIRG incidences that you were looking at?

MR MILLER: So let me just first say that we have never confirmed an exact number. I know that number has been reported. But when it comes to incidents that we have looked at, there have been some incidents – I think I’ve spoken to this before – there have been some incidents that go through the process that you can pretty quickly take out of the process early on, right. This is a typical factfinding case, when you get presented a potentially concerning incident and you find out that, no, there is actually a justification for that incident, or there wasn’t the harm that was reported. And you can take those out of the process.

Then there are the more difficult ones, and those take time. And those are ongoing. I don’t have a conclusion to report out yet.

QUESTION: And none of those have been concluded, though —

MR MILLER: So what my point – what my point is, there are some that – yeah, yeah.

QUESTION: — that have made it to that later stage?

MR MILLER: No, no, they have not. There are some that have been concluded that were in the earlier stage, but no with respect to that.

QUESTION: And to this new channel that is meeting in December, can you give us a sense of what particular incidents would rise to that channel versus the existing channels? How much overlap are we going to see here?

MR MILLER: I don’t want to speak to it publicly, but there are a number of incidents – you’ve heard me speak to a number of incidents from this podium, you’ve heard the Secretary speak to them. We have raised some of them in the National Security Memo 20 report that we issued back in April. There are a number of incidents that we have had questions about, and we have had concerns about, without speaking to any one of those. We certainly have a list of incidents to go through in that channel – which is not to say that we haven’t sought answers through existing channels; we have. But we set up this new channel because we wanted to formalize a mechanism for getting answers to some of these questions.

QUESTION: And then on Gaza, there’s reports of just this prevalence of looting of humanitarian aid by gangs in Gaza. There’s a report from the Post today that Israeli official – Israeli forces are looking the other way on this, or actively facilitating it. What is the U.S. assessment of whether Israel is doing enough to stop this looting in Gaza?

MR MILLER: So let me just first say with respect to the looting that’s ongoing: First of all, it’s abhorrent, and the people who are looting humanitarian assistance for their own ends are taking food and medicine out of the hands of civilians, including children, who need it, incredibly desperate people who need access to this food. And anyone who is stealing or diverting humanitarian assistance for their own profit, for their own gain, is quite obviously harming their own people and they should stop immediately. That’s the first thing that I think needs to be made clear when it comes to looting.

Second when it comes to looting – so what we have seen is a breakdown in the security situation inside of Gaza. And there are a lot of reasons for the breakdown in that security situation. And what we are trying to work through is with the IDF, with COGAT, with the relevant UN agencies, to find solutions to get more security assistance delivered to the people that need it.

So one of the things you heard us speak to last week is at our request, the IDF opened new routes to deliver humanitarian assistance. And we are hopeful that some of those new routes will help divert – divert convoys away from looters. But this has been a problem that’s been ongoing for some time. It was a problem several months ago, and we were able to work a security situation – work through a security situation, working through the – our UN partners. A lot of that work we can’t really speak to, given it’s a sensitive security question. But it is – it is a critical goal to make sure humanitarian assistance gets to where it needs to go.

Now, that said, ultimately you are not going to fully, finally solve this problem without an end to the war and the establishment of a new governance and security authority inside Gaza. Because ultimately that is the problem right now, is that there is an absence of a governing authority, and it’s why we continue to work to establish a new governing authority, to make sure that there is someone who – if armed criminal gangs come to loot convoys, that there is someone that can stand up and stop them. And that is an urgent priority for the United States.

QUESTION: At this point, though, is the IDF and COGAT doing enough?

MR MILLER: So they’re working to establish a security – an improved security situation on the ground. But clearly, when you have looting going on, there’s a breakdown, and the IDF certainly bears part of the blame for that, the overall breakdown in authority, the end of an actual government – a government we oppose, to be clear, but a government that was providing day-to-day security. And critically, the lack of a replacement with anything else is ultimately the key culprit for the lack of security on the ground right now, which is why I get back to this point, that we have to find an end to the war and the replacement.

I don’t think anyone believes – at least no one in our government believes and most people in the region don’t believe – that the IDF ought to be the occupying power inside Gaza providing security for the delivery of humanitarian assistance. There needs to be Palestinian-led security that is preventing convoys from being looted and preserving law and order, and that’s what we’re trying to work towards.

Yeah.

QUESTION: Off the back of Jenny’s questioning on the routes and you saying that you had asked – the U.S. had asked Israel to open up new routes, what happened over the weekend, this was something that happened near the Kerem Shalom crossing. And in The Washington Post piece that Jenny mentioned, they had said that humanitarian groups had asked – they had asked Israeli authorities to open up routes that would be safer, that would avoid the criminal gangs. So these routes that they’d asked for – are those the same routes that the U.S. was asking Israel to open up? Are they different routes?

MR MILLER: So I don’t know which route specifically that they are referring to in the story, that the humanitarian groups were referring to in the story. But what we have communicated to the Government of Israel – and lots of times we make these requests of the Government of Israel on behalf of humanitarian organizations that we work with. Remember the – that USAID is the largest provider of humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian people. It gets delivered through the UN agencies who, in many event, are having their convoys being attacked.

So we make these requests for them to open new routes. Whether they are the same specific routes in this instance that the UN agencies are asking for, I can’t speak to with that level of detail. But in general, we are in contact with them and in communication with them about how to get new routes open that would alleviate some of the security situation.

QUESTION: And I know that you said that, obviously, there is no preference for the U.S. to be an occupying – sorry, for the IDF to be an occupying force within Gaza. Is there any position the U.S. takes in terms of, like, the IDF providing immediate security to trucks a little bit further down the road once they’ve entered crossings like Kerem Shalom? Because this incident happened near the crossing, and there are reports of the IDF standing by whilst there were Palestinian – as you described them – gang members with guns, and the IDF are just not doing anything. So —

MR MILLER: So this is a question that we have been in intense communication with the Government of Israel about, and I don’t want to speak to it publicly here. I would note that there have been times when UN agencies have not wanted security to be provided in certain contexts by a belligerent in the conflict, including this conflict, but this underlying question is something that we are actively working on trying to answer.

QUESTION: Okay. And on Hamas, on the Hamas leadership, you had mentioned yesterday about how – you had mentioned what sounded like extradition of Hamas leaders, that it would be a U.S. preference. Is the U.S. actively pursuing extradition of these Hamas leaders that have reportedly left Doha and are now in Türkiye?

MR MILLER: So when it comes – so I was speaking as a policy matter. Anytime that there is a fugitive from U.S. justice, they – we want to see them return to the U.S. to face justice. But when it comes to specific extradition requests, as you know, it’s our longstanding policy not to comment on those. They’re a legal matter for the Department of Justice.

QUESTION: Okay. And then these – just last one – on these sanctions that were announced on the Hamas leaders today, is that related to some of these Hamas leaders that are reportedly now in Türkiye, or was it just already in the pipeline?

MR MILLER: I would have to go back and check. I don’t know the specific location – these were sanctions that were already in the pipeline well before the —

QUESTION: Three of them are apparently in Türkiye.

MR MILLER: So I’d say these are sanctions that were in the pipeline well before the last week. I didn’t know – I don’t personally know the exact location of those. But we have sanctioned Hamas leaders that lived in Doha, that lived in Gaza, that lived in relative places around the Middle East.

QUESTION: Just to be clear, you’re confirming some of these Hamas leaders are now in Türkiye?

MR MILLER: I said I don’t know the location of —

QUESTION: Okay. So you’re not confirming their whereabouts?

MR MILLER: I – my – I —

QUESTION: I was saying —

MR MILLER: I think she confirmed the —

QUESTION: Yes.

MR MILLER: — the whereabouts of them. I —

QUESTION: No, I’m asking you.

MR MILLER: I am not. No. No, I very much am not. I can’t speak to location of specific members of Hamas.

QUESTION: Can you – if it is, in fact, true that you press countries to return or to extradite people indicted in U.S. courts, what about the woman in the Sbarro bombing in Israel years ago who’s been living free in Jordan now? There was long talk of her – of efforts to get her extradited, and nothing has ever come of them. So why should these Hamas guys worry if you’re just going to —

MR MILLER: Matt, I’m going to admit you’re speaking to a case that predates my tenure, that I have a limited, at best, factual understanding of it, so I shouldn’t speak to it. But when it comes to these terrorists who are members and leadership of a group who continue to hold Americans hostage, we do think it’s appropriate that they face justice.

QUESTION: And just one —

MR MILLER: Yeah.

QUESTION: — more thing on that, Matt. Secretary has met with the Turkish foreign minister today.

MR MILLER: Correct.

QUESTION: Was there a discussion about this particular issue with the Turkish foreign minister?

MR MILLER: So he did meet with the Turkish Foreign Minister Fidan in Rio today on the sidelines of the G20. We’ll have a readout coming later today. And I don’t want to get into too much detail about what, of course, are private diplomatic conversations. But in all of these conversations with countries in the region, he makes clear, number one, that there should be no more business as usual with Hamas and, number two, that any country should use any influence it has with Hamas to secure the release of all the hostages, including the seven American hostages.

QUESTION: Right. But those can be a little bit contradictory, don’t you think, to use the – I mean, is there a – I guess what I’m trying to ask is: Is there any chance that Türkiye might become the new mediator? Is that something the U.S. would want?

MR MILLER: So the first question is one for Türkiye to speak to. But when it comes to using influence with Hamas to secure the release of hostages, we would welcome any country playing that kind of positive role. That’s what we want to see. But the important thing is that countries step up and use that influence and actually work to try to get these hostages out.

QUESTION: Okay.

MR MILLER: And, by the way, an important goal of getting the hostages out, not just for their own sake but for countries who want to see an end to the war – that is one very clear way to end the war.

QUESTION: Yeah. There was an Israeli report, by the way, last week that head of Israel’s domestic intelligence agency traveled to Türkiye and met with Turkish intelligence head. What do you make of that meeting? Could that be, in any way, related to, like, Türkiye emerging as a mediator?

MR MILLER: I wouldn’t want to speculate. That sounds like a question for those two governments to speak to, not me.

QUESTION: Well, you guys are right in the middle of it, so it is a question for the United States.

MR MILLER: I think when it comes to any potential meeting we would – I would let the – those two governments speak to it and certainly what it means in terms of the import of any such meeting. But when it comes to countries that have influence with Hamas – and certainly, Türkiye is a country that has had influence with Hamas – we want to see all of those countries use that influence to secure the release of all hostages, especially including the seven Americans who continue to be held hostage.

Yeah. Oh, you had your hand up a minute ago. Now you don’t.

QUESTION: Yes, I —

QUESTION: Matt —

MR MILLER: I’m just doing my work down. I get going in order and forget – yeah. (Laughter.)

QUESTION: No, I had a Ukraine question, but we are – we were done with —

MR MILLER: No, we can go to – we can go to – yeah. If you want to go to Ukraine, go to —

MR MILLER: So I don’t want to speak to any potential policy changes. It’s not something that we have spoken to, as of this point. It’s not something that we have confirmed. I’m not going to do so from here. And so if I’m not going to speak to any potential changes, I’m certainly not going to comment on any potential outcomes from them.

QUESTION: A follow-up, Matt?

MR MILLER: Okay. Yeah.

QUESTION: Today marks 1,000 days since the full-scale war. I’m assuming you guys are going to have a statement coming or —

MR MILLER: You have seen the United Nation – our ambassador to the United Nations Security Council speak to it already today. You have seen our ambassador speak to it today. So yeah, we have spoken to it.

QUESTION: Just step back, Matt. Just when we were two weeks into this, three weeks into this, the President called out Putin, were calling a war criminal. He called his actions genocide. He even said that he’s terrorizing the Ukrainians. I was wondering, given you guys have multiple weeks left, are you considering to seize this momentum and to come up with those policy decisions such as designating Russia as a state —

MR MILLER: How about such policy decisions as assembling a coalition of 50 countries to support Ukraine and hold Russia accountable; how about policy decisions such as surging billions of dollars in U.S. support to Ukraine that has led them to be able to win the battle of Kyiv, to push Russians back from territory that they had occupied; how about policy decisions that have led to freezing Russian sovereign assets, and not just the United States freezing Russian sovereign assets but leading other countries to freeze Russian sovereign assets and use the interest from those assets to directly support Ukraine? So if you look at the long history of policy decisions, Alex, I think our record’s pretty clear.

QUESTION: But does the administration still believe that Putin is committing a genocide and this is a terror that’s happening every single day?

MR MILLER: If you – and if you look at our record, our record is one of holding Putin accountable and one of holding Russia accountable. And you just have to look at the results on the battlefield and the way that Ukrainians – principally through their own courage and their own dedication, but with the support of the United States and our coalition – have held Russia directly accountable on the battlefield. That is the true testament of our record.

QUESTION: Is there any concern on your end that Putin might eventually get away with this?

MR MILLER: So when you look at whatever happens with the outcome of this war, it has already been a massive strategic failure for Russia: hundreds of thousands of causalities; economy that has been weakened; a generation that has been mortgaged to support a war of conquest and that has already seen Russia lose much of the territory that it initially gained. So whatever the ultimate outcome of this war, we continue to believe that Ukraine’s future is a future that is rooted in a West as an independent, democratic country, something that Vladimir Putin completely opposes. And Russia’s future will continue to be one that is incredibly weakened as a result of Putin’s disastrous decision, and I don’t think anything that happens is going to change that outcome.

QUESTION: Thank you. I want to move to the South Caucasus, if I may. I have —

MR MILLER: Sure.

MR MILLER: So Alex, let me just quibble a little bit. The comprehensive review is still ongoing. But as you know because you have reported in – and after asking me questions about it, we have already suspended assistance as a result of that review. So it’s not like the review is ongoing and nothing has happened. We have already taken policy actions as a part of that review and we will continue to take other policy actions as appropriate.

QUESTION: Any reaction to past couple of days —

MR MILLER: Go ahead. Let me – I’m going to go —

QUESTION: Okay.

MR MILLER: Go ahead.

QUESTION: In regards to Mr. Hochstein’s visit to Lebanon, Arab reports – Arab countries’ reports are saying that the source of his optimism is that he received signals from President-elect Trump that would help him in achieving his mission between Beirut and Jerusalem. What’s your say?

MR MILLER: So as I said – and I think it was response to Humeyra’s question – I’m not going to comment on the underlying diplomatic negotiations, but of course you shouldn’t believe everything that is reported.

MR MILLER: So we remain tightly coordinated with our E3 partners in advance of the IAEA Board of Governors meeting, and we strongly support efforts to hold Iran accountable. As the President has made clear, the United States will ensure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon. The Iranian regime continues to amass a growing stockpile of highly enriched uranium for which there is no credible civilian purpose, and they continue to not cooperate fully with the IAEA. So what we’re going to do is continue to work with the IAEA Board of Governors members to ensure their full cooperation with the IAEA so that the IAEA can provide the assurances that we need that Iran’s nuclear program remains exclusively peaceful. So I’m not going to preview any actions that might – we might take over the next few days in consultation with our partners, but we will remain tightly coordinated with them.

QUESTION: When you just referred to the growing stockpile of enriched uranium, you’re talking about this latest IAEA report that came out either yesterday or earlier today?

MR MILLER: Correct. Yeah.

QUESTION: Which is, like, significant increase in the amount of 60 percent —

MR MILLER: Yes, correct.

QUESTION: That’s what you’re referring to?

MR MILLER: Correct.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MR MILLER: Yeah, I’ll come back.

MR MILLER: So I am unfortunately not surprised by the comments the Kremlin has made around the publication of this new revised nuclear doctrine. Since the beginning of its war of aggression against Ukraine, it has sought to coerce and intimidate both Ukraine and other countries around the world through irresponsible nuclear rhetoric and behavior. Despite what Russia says, neither the United States nor NATO pose any threat to Russia. Russia’s irresponsible and bellicose rhetoric will not do anything to improve Russia’s security.

And I would just add that the change in this policy in itself just highlights Russia’s hypocrisy. Russia is suggesting here that they would use or could use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state if they undertake the same kind of aggression that Russia itself is inflicting upon Ukraine and its people. So we have not seen any reason to adjust our own nuclear posture, but we will continue to call on Russia to stop bellicose and irresponsible rhetoric.

Yeah.

QUESTION: Can I follow up on —

MR MILLER: So let me just say, just speaking generally – not with respect to this report, but speaking generally – we are incredibly concerned about hybrid warfare conducted by Russia both in Europe and around the world, and it’s something that we have been in close coordination with our European allies and our other allies and partners around the world and we have made clear on a number of occasions to Russia that it would be held accountable for.

Now, when it comes to this specific incident, we’ve seen these reports. It is our understanding that a number of the countries in question have announced investigations into the matter, and we’ll of course await for the outcome of those investigations before speaking to them specifically.

Yeah.

MR MILLER: So I’m not going to speak to any specific strike other than to say of course we mourn the loss of any civilian life and we have made clear to Israel that it needs to take every precaution possible to avoid any loss of civilian life. But I will say this type of action is precisely why we continue to seek a diplomatic resolution to this conflict, because you have seen over the course of the past year civilians, both in Israel and in Lebanon, be the unfortunate victims of this fight. And we want to see civilians protected, which is why we are working so hard to get a diplomatic resolution that would stop the fighting across the Blue Line and would allow civilians on both sides of the border to return home and would also allow civilians throughout Lebanon to feel safe and civilians throughout Israel to feel safe from the threat of terrorism.

QUESTION: Throughout the course of Gaza – the Gaza campaign – we’ve asked you a lot if you’re satisfied with the precautions that Israel has taken there. Are you satisfied with the precautions – the civilian precautions that they’re taking in Lebanon?

MR MILLER: We are not – we are never satisfied when you – sorry to interrupt you – we are never satisfied when you see civilian deaths, and we want to see civilian deaths be zero. We understand that the type of conflict that Israel is operating in and is forced to deal with and the type of situation they’re forced to deal with, we understand that Hizballah, like Hamas, hides its arsenal, hides its fighters, hides its infrastructure in civilian homes, in other structures, and so it’s a very difficult situation that Israel has to face, but that doesn’t minimize the responsibility. But ultimately, it’s why we’re trying to get to a diplomatic resolution that would stop this fighting.

QUESTION: Yeah, thank you, Matt. Yesterday, Israeli foreign minister, he sent a letter to UN Security Council president and urged UN to push Iraq to take immediate actions against the Iranian-backed militia for attacking Israel. So has Israel ever reached out to you to pass or to send a letter to Iraqi Government in the course of the last months?

MR MILLER: I’m not going to speak to private diplomatic conversations. I’ve – you – as you know, you asked me yesterday about the underlying question, and I spoke to that. And that continues to be our position that Iraq should do everything within its power to stop terrorist attacks both within its borders and in – against targets outside its borders. But with respect to any specific diplomatic conversations, I’m not going to speak to that.

QUESTION: But what he said in the letter – I said emphasizes that the Iraqi Government is responsible for everything that’s happening in their territory, so – and Israel has a right to self-defense. Do you agree with him that Iraqi Government is responsible for the actions of these militia groups that are – they are using Iraqi territory to attack Israel?

MR MILLER: So certainly we want to see the Iraqi Government do everything within its power to stop these type of terrorist attacks. I think I’ll leave it at that.

MR MILLER: So we welcome Iraq’s first census since 1997 which will be taken – taking place this week. It includes all Iraqi provinces. This census is important in the same way that the United States conducts its census: to provide accurate information for Iraq to tailor its political, economic, and development strategies. And we encourage all Iraqis, including residents of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, to participate in the census.

MR MILLER: So we are aware of reports that a military convoy was ambushed near the border with Afghanistan and of a separate incident that resulted in the abduction of seven police officers in Bannu yesterday. We condemn these and all terrorist attacks. The Pakistani people have suffered greatly at the hands of terrorists and violent extremists, and our hearts go out to the families and loved ones of those killed or impacted by recent attacks, including the November 9th suicide bombing in Quetta. And I would just say, as these horrific attacks against the Pakistani people continue, we remain committed to engaging with government leaders and civilian institutions to identify opportunities to build capacity in detecting, preventing, and responding to threats posed by militant terrorist groups.

QUESTION: Sir, all these terrorist groups are based in Afghanistan, and Taliban, who promised not to allow these terrorist groups to use Afghan soil as a launching pad, actually patronizing these terrorist groups. The U.S. has the capability to target these terrorist dens, but we haven’t seen any action since long. Why is that?

MR MILLER: So we continue to have an important bilateral counterterrorism partnership with the Government of Pakistan, and it includes regular high-level dialogues and working level consultations dedicated to enhancing both civilian and military capabilities to detect and counter these type of threats.

MR MILLER: What was the last part of the question? I just didn’t hear.

QUESTION: Sir, President Biden met Modi.

MR MILLER: I heard that part. I didn’t hear the —

QUESTION: Yeah, any discussion on the —

MR MILLER: Oh, so when it comes to —

QUESTION: Yeah.

MR MILLER: — the President’s meeting, just as always, I’d refer you to the White House for a specific readout. But regarding the plot to kill a Sikh American in the United States, I would just say, as you have heard us say before, we – the U.S. Government continues to treat this issue with the upmost importance and continues to pursue accountability through a number of different pathways.

Yeah, go ahead. Yeah.

MR MILLER: That was separate from – that was separate from the call. I wasn’t – I didn’t mention —

QUESTION: Right.

MR MILLER: — that that was part of the call. I was talking about the transition process separately and apart from the call.

Go ahead. Just a clarification.

QUESTION: Understood.

MR MILLER: Go ahead.

QUESTION: With that said —

MR MILLER: Clarify your request for a clarification. Go ahead.

QUESTION: (Laughter.) Yes. Both administrations have said that they are signaling to the other that they can try to coordinate or want to coordinate on reaching a ceasefire in Gaza and freeing the hostages. Are you saying, is the State Department is saying that that work at the State Department level cannot happen until there’s an MOU signed by the incoming administration?

MR MILLER: So there is a – just as a legal process – and this is set out under U.S. law, specifically the act that was passed in the last several years to govern the transfer of power, the peaceful transfer of power. There is a process that has to take place before we can, say for example, brief members of an incoming transition team on classified information. And we are ready to go. So far, the incoming transition team has not availed themselves of that process. And it’s up to them to speak to the timing to that, but we are ready to go as soon as they are.

That said, we are committed to doing everything that we can to make this a successful transition. That includes of course briefing the incoming administration at the appropriate time, when they have completed the appropriate steps, about world events and about how we see world events and about things that we believe that they need to know when they come into power. But there is only one president at a time, and we will continue to pursue the policies, including work for diplomatic resolutions to conflicts in the Middle East, through January 20th.

QUESTION: Final question. There was a meeting this morning completely behind closed doors at the UN Security Council regarding the Gaza ceasefire and hostage release resolution. The U.S. appears to be pressuring the E10 to remove or to change some of the text in there. Can you give some information, some clarification, as to what exactly the U.S. is pressing for right now in terms of the text that needs to be changed?

MR MILLER: I don’t think it’d be appropriate for me to do so at this point. We are having private conversations with other members of the Security Council about a potential resolution, but at this point we should keep those conversations private.

Yeah, go ahead.

MR MILLER: No. In fact, I —

QUESTION: — inside Russia.

MR MILLER: In fact, I, in response to your question earlier in the briefing, said no, I’m not going to confirm it.

QUESTION: So Ukraine hasn’t used U.S. missiles to strike —

MR MILLER: I am not going to confirm that report. Ukraine of course is free to speak to what they have or have not done, but I’m not going to confirm at this point any U.S. policy change.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MR MILLER: So as I said a moment ago, a number of the countries in the region are conducting their own investigations. And at this point, until we have further information, we’re going to await the outcome of those investigations.

QUESTION: And was the decision to undo the missile restraints discussed with allies? Does the administration hope that the UK and France follow suit with Storm Shadow missiles?

MR MILLER: I think I’ve answered that question – or maybe more specifically, declined to answer that question – already today, and I’m going to do so again.

MR MILLER: So I’m not going to speak to that in any detail. The Secretary and Senator Rubio, Secretary-designate Rubio, had a conversation yesterday where the Secretary pledged our full cooperation to ensure —

QUESTION: Sorry – was it yesterday or two days ago?

MR MILLER: I’m sorry, two days – I spoke to it yesterday. They spoke over the weekend. Pledged our full cooperation to ensure a successful transition – but I think we ought to keep the rest of the conversations private.

QUESTION: I mean, Senator Rubio, he is on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, so the two could meet anyway —

MR MILLER: Absolutely. And we will have that discussion with Senator Rubio but not with you. Apologies. (Laughter.)

QUESTION: Oh, shots fired. (Laughter.)

QUESTION: Thanks, Matthew.

MR MILLER: Go ahead.

MR MILLER: So as I said in response to a question earlier, we are going to remain tightly coordinated with our E3 partners in advance of this Board of Governors meeting. We strongly support efforts to hold Iran accountable, but we are not going to preview any actions that we are contemplating or detail private diplomatic conversations, including with our E3 partners.

QUESTION: Okay. And then there are – based on our Iranian sources, there are threats coming out of Islamic Republic. They are saying that they are going to activate advanced centrifuges in response to IAEA resolution. They are going to – they are threatening that they are going to encompass the nuclear sphere in all of this rhetoric. Do you take this sort of threat seriously?

MR MILLER: I am not going to respond to those reports. As we have made clear, what Iran should do is cooperate with the IAEA, and I’ll leave it at that for now.

QUESTION: And one about the snapback mechanism. Sorry.

MR MILLER: Yeah, sorry. Go ahead.

QUESTION: Let’s say now or in the upcoming few weeks that you have the Biden administration, do you support the activation of snapback mechanism?

MR MILLER: We are going to continue to consult with our allies and partners on this question, as with all questions that pertain to Iran, and I will leave it at that and keep those private.

Go ahead.

MR MILLER: You noticed, huh? (Laughter.)

QUESTION: But Assistant Secretary Nichols gave an interview to a Brazilian newspaper where it was – it seemed like he was confirming it, or it was taken as such by —

MR MILLER: It was taken as such. I can tell you the assistant secretary was speaking to our long record of decisions to support Ukraine in its fight against Russia’s aggression.

QUESTION: Okay, so another thing. Minister Lavrov said today that without the Americans it is impossible to use these high-tech missiles. And without going into if you allow that or not, can you comment on that? At least, I mean, is that – does the operation of these missiles require American involvement?

MR MILLER: So I’m not going to speak to that. But has the United States shared intelligence with Ukraine? Absolutely we have. Have we shared that intelligence with Ukraine with the expectation that it would improve their performance on the battlefield? Absolutely. And we will continue to do that.

Yeah, go ahead.

QUESTION: Excuse me. I have two questions on Israel. On November 7th, Israel parliament, or the Knesset, they passed after second, third reading a law that allowed the government to detain 13-years-old kids. And the law as well allow the government to deport it – like, their relatives or families of any Palestinians are doing any operation or attacks inside, like, Israel. And this was seen as collective, like, punishment or, like, targeting Arab people who lives in occupied East Jerusalem. So how you comment on this? Is this law that targeting family and targeting kids —

MR MILLER: So I wasn’t tracking this specific piece of legislation. I’ll have to take it back and take a look at it, and get you a comment.

QUESTION: You told me the same answer in November 7th. Like, I ask it and you told me I’m going to take a look, and you —

MR MILLER: We will take it back. As you probably know is our standard practice when we get questions like this, we take it back, we can look into it and email you a response, and we’re happy to do so.

MR MILLER: Can I just ask you to get to the question?

QUESTION: Yeah, yeah. Like, the question – yeah – this question: In the U.S. policy, it’s called West Bank or Yehuda and Samaria?

MR MILLER: You have heard me repeatedly refer to the West Bank as the West Bank; you have heard the Secretary refer to it as the West Bank —

QUESTION: Will it change?

MR MILLER: — and the President refer to it as the West Bank. Incoming —

QUESTION: Will it change?

MR MILLER: Hold on. An incoming administration has the ability to make their —

QUESTION: To change it?

MR MILLER: To what?

QUESTION: To change it to Yehuda and Samaria?

MR MILLER: The administration has the – an incoming administration has the ability – I don’t think this is a secret – to use the terms that they feel are appropriate. But we have made clear that we believe the West Bank is properly referred to as the West Bank.

Let me go ahead, wrap – go here and we’ll wrap for the day.

MR MILLER: Yeah. So we are extremely concerned about this action. You have heard us speak out against it in the past. And just before the briefing, we released a statement where we announced that we are – that we are imposing new visa restrictions on Hong Kong authorities for their participation in this action.

QUESTION: Can you say how many officials?

MR MILLER: I cannot.

And we’ll leave it at that for the day. Thanks, everyone.

(The briefing was concluded at 2:09 p.m.)